Reading: the Best, Funniest

So, here I am with a long list of books to devour. I’ll asess what’s come before, this year, last week, etc. Last week I read Jane Shapiro’s The Dangerous Husband in two sittings. It would have been one, but life happens. It’s the funniest book I’ve read all year. Well, it might tie with Leonard Michaels’ A Girl With A  Monkey: New and Selected Stories. At one point while glued to The Dangerous Husband, my husband asks me what I’m reading. And I say, this guy is just so clumsy his wife must hire a hit man! I probably looked giddy, elated. My husband looked horrified. It’s a great book, a funny book.

I also read Victor LaValle’s The Ecstatic last week. It was a really good book that somehow manages to be boring and enthralling at the same time. Boring isn’t the right word….maybe pedestrian? No, it’s extraordinary and ordinary. It’s the first person voice that captivates, in addition to the bizarre family dynamics at play. It’s feels so real it’s sad, and some of it is so sad it’s funny, and that’s life.

Best book I’ve read all year: The Effect of Living Backwards by Heidi Julavitz.  I don’t know what is up with some of the poor reviews on Amazon. Some folks obviously found it too difficult to read; several reviews say the storyline is too obtuse. I thought it was incredible, thrilling. And the reviewers who give only one star and admit to not being able to get past the first chapter–classy, real classy. In close second (or maybe a tie?) comes Kathryn Davis’ The Thin Place, which pretty much floored me on first read.

I’m in the middle of The Intuitionist right now…

Pynchon’s New Novel…

Someone doesn’t like Against the Day:

Thomas Pynchon’s new novel, “Against the Day,” reads like the sort of imitation of a Thomas Pynchon novel that a dogged but ungainly fan of this author’s might have written on quaaludes.

But she often gets her panties in wad, right? Here’s another take on it. And another. I’ll have to obtain a copy and see for myself, which will take a while, the obtaining and the seeing both.

The Graphic Issue

The 29th issue of Tin House came in the mail the other day, and all I can say is Wow, just wow.  It’s subtitled “The Graphic Issue,” and that’s absolutely what it is. There are excerpts from graphic novels, a graphic essay, and get this, the forward from Gravity’s Rainbow Illustrated.  That’s right, somebody illustrated every page of that book.  I have to admit I haven’t finished Gravity’s Rainbow after a number of years, but I love Pynchon none-the-less; The Crying of Lot 49 was awesome. So, who would do such a thing?  From the “Editor’s Note” of issue 29:

Zak Smith contributed some of his pen-and-ink drawings from his awe-inspiring project, Gravity’s Rainbow Illustrated, in which the Ivy League artist/punk porn star matched all 760 pages of Pynchon’s classic, image-for-page.

Punk porn star! In the forward to Gravity’s Rainbow Illustrated you’ll encounter a pornographer with a muted post horn tattoo, and another pornographer named Benny Profane.  What’s the porn-Pynchon connection? Check it out.

ETA: the illustrations online….thanks davidbdale for the link!

What’s New

The new Stephen King talks about his new novel, Lisey’s Story.

Salman Rushdie will join the faculty of Emory in the spring; he will also donate his archives to the university’s library.

Kiran Desai wins the Man Booker Prize.

Cool Sentiments vs. Self-aggrandizing Twitticisms.

I’ve been thinking about different kinds of texts lately, different modes of discourse–new ones, old standards.  I read an article in The Wall Street Journal about networked books (which hopefully I’ll blog about soon, when time allows) and one about novels sent in text message installments (twice a day) over cell phones.  And today I was reminded of an old, but persistent text, a way many people communicate with their fellow man every day: the bumper sticker. I saw one today that made me smile:

I’d rather be reading Flannery O’Conner.

That’s a nice sentiment.  And it sure would beat Atlanta traffic.  BUT, then I saw one on the back of a black Lexus LX something or other SUV.  It was the only sticker, centered right on the back of the car:

Don’t let the car fool you. My treasure is in heaven.

I found a picture of the same sticker on flickr, in case you just can’t believe me. Okey-dokey. So, you’re bragging about your slick (obnoxiously huge) ride, and the fact that you’re so super special you’re guaranteed a place in heaven? Peachy! It doesn’t make that much sense in the first place. If the person who chose this sticker is to be given any credit at all, I can only hope that they do maintain some ironic distance from the reality of the situation.  But, deep down, after much consideration, I can still only assume that the driver of this car is a self-aggrandizing twit.  I hope your heaven is big enough for your ego.

The Fest

My husband took my son, Keegan, to the Decatur Book Festival early Saturday.  They missed the Cat in the Hat parade, but they did catch a reading by Chris Raschka of Charlie Parker Played Be Bop, which is a book meant to give children a sense of Jazz.  My son (20 months old) now struts around the house saying Be Bop!  Be. Bop!  BeBop.  Raschka won the Caldecott Medal in 2006 for The Hello, Goodbye Window (written by Norton Juster).  Raschka’s book Yo! Yes? was a 1994 Caldecott Medal Honor Book.  I’m a big fan of Yo! Yes? It’s a story about friendship in only 34 words.

All three of us went back to the festival that evening.  We stopped by the Five Points booth and wandered around the book market.  Unfortunately, we were there between music performances.  We hung out at Little Shop of Stories, which is a welcoming kids’ bookstore and a Jake’s Ice Cream store in one.  We had to pry Keegan away from a large Elmo doll.  He’s never seen Sesame Street, but he has played Elmo rhyming and alphabet games on the computer.  And that was enough.  He knew who Elmo was, wanted Elmo terribly.  So the Elmo phenomenon begins.  I thought we’d avoid it somehow because we don’t have cable.  We also shared some $5 vegeterian corn dogs. $5!  I didn’t plan ahead to attend any panels or readings, and we were sort of just relaxing this weekend, so I didn’t take full advantage of what Decatur had to offer…But, I do plan on planning ahead and being more involved in the 2007 AWP conference, which is to be here in the great Hotlanta.

ETA: I also picked up a copy of Verb: two and a half hours of original ficiton, poetry, and music on 2 cds.

New Nonrequired reading

My husband brought me The Best American Nonrequired Reading from his trip to San Francisco.  I’m familiar with a few of the Best American series, but not this one.  This is the fourth installment of the nonrquired reading category, edited by Dave Eggers.  And we’ve established that McSweeney’s and 826 Valencia are pretty cool endeavors, right?  So, this should be good–I’ll let  you know.

All This Heavenly Glory

I’ve been making notes to myself about fiction I’ve been reading this summer, keeping my own writing in mind…sort of a fiction journal.  Here is a bit about Elizabeth Crane’s second book, All This Heavenly Glory:

It’s hard to know what to call this book.  If I wanted to be crass, or mean, or jealous, or role play as a crass, mean, jealous person, I could say this is a mess of a book, obviously pieced together from a bunch of short stories and writing exercises which all happen to be about the same character.  I could say it’s a broken product of academia, a sour result of the workshop form.  Meaning, that it’s in no way a novel, and Crane must not know how to write a novel, so she wrote this. 

But I don’t really believe those things.  (I loved this book—it’s one of those two day reads I found enthralling and addictive!)  Crane’s book is innovative and witty and fresh, not broken.  Maybe it is fragmented and fractured, but that how people’s lives are, and that’s what this is about, life.  What I do mean to point out, though, is that it is definitely not a traditional novel.  It’s essentially a collection of stories, I think.  There are 18 different sections, which are often written in different styles and voices.  But Charlotte Anne Byers is the main character throughout—and that sounds like a novel, right?  A whole book about one person?  The first line on the inside of the book jacket says, “Here are the events that make up a life.”  And that’s true, an entire life should certainly lend enough material and cohesion to a novel.  But this isn’t really a novel, is it?  Maybe it’s a postmodern novel.  Kidding!  Or maybe it is collection of stories. (Why I don’t want to fully admit this, I don’t know.  But I think it has to do with the fact that I’ve heard over and over that collections of stories don’t sell; so, it’s not like I want to enthusiastically slap the label stories on a book I write.  And All This Heavenly Glory doesn’t label itself, at least not on the physical cover.)  The book does doesn’t say Novel, or Stories on it anywhere.  Which maybe is for the better, because that book
Florida, which was a pretty little thing, called itself a Novel, and that just gave everyone something to rail against and bitch about.  So, why put yourself in a box?  Crane hasn’t, I guess.  This is her second book.  The first was When the Messenger is Hot, which is most definitely a collection of stories…Okay, Amazon does call All This Heavenly Glory a “collection of interconnected stories.”  Is it because it spans so much time and leaves so much out that it can’t be a novel?  Or is that there are such differing styles in the sections?  I’ll try and let this question rest.

One thing I love about this book is how it straddles the line between literary fiction and what you might call chick-lit.  Crane’s writing is good and innovative, but it’s also witty, irreverent, often funny.  This book is a fine specimen of innovative prose styles—there’s a lot to examine on the technical level, casual as the voice may seem.  But this book is also fun and sexy enough to be an excellent weekend beach book.  

As a side note, I thought the black and gold cover of the hard back was really pretty, but the publishers must have decided otherwise because the paper back just came out with a bright, shiny photograph of a girl and bubbles.  I thought the subtle image on the front of the black cover (a constellation of a woman) was a fitting image that also mirrored the structure of the book.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started